Many of the scientists who signed an open letter against museums taking money from special interests are themselves linked to special interests. Part 3 of 3.
Libraries define intellectual freedom as the public’s right to examine all points-of-view. These climate scientists want to stifle alternative perspectives. Part 2 of 3.
Climate science is a world in which people who donate money to museums are targeted and ostracized. Yet creeps who write about urinating on women get a free pass. Part 1 of 3.
A passage in his 2010 novel makes it clear the former IPCC chairman understands that it’s wrong for an older male boss to seduce a young woman new to his organization.
In the wake of sexual misconduct allegations, Rajendra Pachauri’s semi-autobiographical novel is being taken out of circulation. What possessed him to publish it under his own name while still chairman of the IPCC?
New Delhi police say the former IPCC chairman is violating his bail conditions by hampering their investigation and influencing witnesses.
Men who try to get women into bed via premature, extravagant professions of love aren’t uncommon. But only bosses who view female employees as their personal harem try this within days of a woman joining an organization.
Jean-Pascal van Ypersele became an IPCC official in 2002. Two years later he got into bed with Greenpeace. Part 2 of 2.
The second-in-command at the IPCC wants a promotion, but has no intention of addressing critics’ concerns. Part 1 of 2.
Indian journalists are the only ones examining the wider implications of Rajendra Pachauri’s resignation.
TERI women have summoned the courage to speak up about the nature of their workplace. Will TERI’s men step forward and do their part?
Invited to deliver a lecture in memory of a talented and successful feminist judge, Rajendra Pachauri didn’t think her half of humanity was worth mentioning.
Why is a man accused of egregious sexual harassment still the chancellor of a university? Why is he still on a UNESCO panel when that entity says gender equality is a global priority?
Electronic messages cited in a Delhi police report tell the story of a spirited young woman who effectively lost her job because she wouldn’t let her boss grope her.
In his home country, the former chairman of the IPCC is being loudly denounced.
A court has barred the former IPCC chairman from his workplace and forbidden travel abroad without permission. A conference at Harvard University has withdrawn his guest speaker invitation.
Is the former chairman of the IPCC genuinely ill – or is this a ‘strategic move’ on the part of his legal team to forestall his arrest?
The resignation letter of the IPCC chairman is a two-page love letter to himself.
Rajendra Pachauri’s TERI institute appears to be a workplace in which female employees are continually groped, pestered, and invited to spend private time with the boss.
Additional women are stepping forward with tales of inappropriate behaviour on the part of Rajendra Pachauri, who has chaired the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) since 2002.
Texts and emails allegedly sent by IPCC chairman Rajendra Pachauri tell a disturbing tale. Months after a female subordinate objected repeatedly and strenuously to his sexual advances, the head of a UN body continued to physically and electronically stalk her.
The IPCC chairman’s latest adventures with journalists, courts, and police.
Rajendra Pachauri is being investigated under four sections of the Indian Penal Code – which stipulate maximum prison sentences of two, three, and seven years.
According to a police complaint, one of the biggest names in climate science grabbed, touched, and forcibly kissed a female subordinate in the workplace.
A health care system in crisis. A $300 billion debt. Yet this government is worried about climate change.
Ecological collapse isn’t the only threat to our well-being.
People who employ the word ‘denier’ in a climate context are silencing normal, healthy debate.
Charged with assessing the achievements of others, a jury that includes IPCC chairman Pachauri decides to heap honours on one of its own.
Ordinary citizens have been force-fed a diet of dubious climate claims. Is it a surprise that some people now equate climate skepticism with murder?
Forget global warming. Tens of thousands of seniors are dying from the cold here and now.
Taking fossil fuel money is immoral. Says the blog of a science communicator who wore Shell logos to work.
A Greenpeace activist thinks the world would be a better place if we chopped off “everyone’s heads.”
Celebrities are making public pronouncements about the upcoming climate summit in Paris. Just as they did about the Copenhagen summit six years ago.
Governments fund solar capacity in countries that receive little sun and install wind turbines in nations that get little wind.
If journalists can’t stray from the ‘we’re all gonna die!’ climate narrative without being pilloried, we really are doomed.
Scientists worthy of respect recognize that it’s possible for two highly-qualified, honourable people to look at the same data and come to different conclusions.
A few decades hence, it will seem as though 95% of today’s journalists were the recipients of lobotomies. Their ability to see beyond the press release in climate matters appears to be non-existent.
The alleged climate crisis is just one more idiotic prediction about the future.
Desecrating cultural and religious monuments is normal Greenpeace behaviour.
Jobs are good. A decent standard of living is good. Both generate emissions. Let’s get over it.
Described as a “professor of climate science,” Chris Rapley has no teaching duties. Described as a “climate scientist,” he has spent decades in administrative roles.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: threatening us with hellfire and damnation.
An organization whose reputation is in tatters links its new document to a rude, intolerant, highly politicized climate crusader.
A scathing critique of anti-human environmentalism is now an affordable e-book.
Two recent articles in prestigious journals demonstrate that health care is now outrageously contaminated by politics.
Why did a scientific organization issue a statement about the Scottish independence vote?
The European Environment Foundation doesn’t make it easy to analyze the names of the 160 individuals who signed last week’s climate declaration.
Five years ago, we were told that the 2009 Copenhagen climate summit was the last chance to save civilization. As the 2015 Paris summit approaches, the same sort of fear mongering is ramping up.
Green energy lobbyists pretending to be eco prize winners have signed a climate change declaration. Its real purpose is to secure more green energy funding.
A full-page advertisement in the New York Times falsely claims that 160 signatories to a climate declaration are all “environmental prize winners.”