Canadian journalist Donna Laframboise. Former National Post & Toronto Star columnist, past vice president of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association.
.
.
Speculating about what goes on at the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is one thing. Reading firsthand accounts is another.
In 2010 232 people completed a questionnaire distributed by a committee investigating the IPCC. In December 2010, those answers were released into the public domain. (After the names of the respondents were removed, the answers were compiled in a 3-megabyte, 678-page PDF available here from the InterAcademy Council website.)
Each questionnaire begins with the individual declaring what roles s/he has played in the IPPC process. In some cases, questionnaire respondents were interested observers of the IPCC process. In others, their involvement was limited to that of expert reviewer.
I have focused my attention on a subset of the answers – the ones that were provided by IPCC insiders. This includes:
In a continuing series of blog posts, I examine what these insiders tell us about the IPCC. Is everyone really a top-notch, world-class expert? Do they all trust the climate models? What do they really think of chairman Rajendra Pachauri?
.
.
Pingback: Donna Laframboise: Climategate 2.0 | The Climate Scam
Pingback: Of peers, reviews, missing data and … communication « The View From Here
Pingback: Blindspots at the IPCC « NoFrakkingConsensus
Pingback: IPCC…ideological, not scientific | pindanpost
Pingback: independent.academia.edu
Pingback: managernaobcasach.pl
Pingback: John Holdren's IPCC Myths - NewsCream