Canadian journalist Donna Laframboise. Former National Post & Toronto Star columnist, past vice president of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association.
On page 25 of Chapter 2 and page 58 of Chapter 4 (Working Group 2 report of the AR5), the sole evidence the IPCC cites for a claim about the Arctic is a 2012 document authored by Christie and Sommerkorn.
This is not peer-reviewed science, published in a reputable scientific journal. Rather, it is a publication produced by the activist WWF.
Even after the embarrassing Himalayan glacier scandal, in 2014 the IPCC still permits its personnel to treat activist publications as reliable evidence.
.
.
of recruiting scientific personnel with close links to activist organizations such as Greenpeace and the WWF. See, for example, here, here, here, here, here, and here.
.
.
Pingback: When Scientific Evidence is Ambiguous, Private Philosophies Matter | Big Picture News, Informed Analysis