Politicians & 10-year-olds think banning drinking straws in rich nations will address improper garbage disposal in poor ones.
If it had been within his power to take the steps he insisted were necessary, the human rights abuses would have been horrendous.
When you give money to the Sierra Club, you’re doing three bad things.
The Sierra Club is a lawsuit factory. Responding to its legal assaults wastes mountains of public money.
The Sierra Club is swimming in money from affluent individuals, wealthy foundations, and blue chip companies. This is not a grassroots organization.
A bona fide climate scientist tells US Senators we have no idea whether human-caused global warming will be a serious problem. The media doesn’t report it.
Environmentalists think Australian states can’t be trusted to make their own decisions. They want them overruled by bureaucrats thousands of miles away.
Activists & journalists insist that Canada’s climate policies have destroyed our international good name. But survey results released yesterday indicate – for the 3rd consecutive year – that we have “the world’s best reputation.”
Truth squads. Pushing “bitter pills” down other people’s throat. Democracy’s new enemies are green.
Politicians, having blindly parroted environmentalist rhetoric about green jobs, look increasingly foolish.
It takes chutzpah to accuse other people of something you yourself are peddling.
The Sierra Club blogger who wrongly predicted that this winter would be “less wintery” & snowy than last now says Arctic sea ice won’t “survive this summer.”
The Sierra Club is “outraged” by a Keystone pipeline report. This is as newsworthy as saying the Pope is Catholic.
An oil pipeline is described as a “carbon bomb” that will impact the “children of all species forever.”
The Sierra Club took fossil fuel money. Lots of it. How dare it falsely accuse other people of doing this.
Liberty. Freedom. These ideas inspire risk-taking and self-sacrifice. But the green movement offers the exact opposite.
Green activists accuse the government of waging a “war on nature and democracy.” But there’s nothing democratic about claiming to speak for future generations.
It’s no longer easy to locate the splattergate video on YouTube.
Iowa scientists have signed a letter about climate change. News reports don’t mention their activist leanings.
If you were hosting a sustainability conference that criticized energy-intensive lifestyles and over-consumption, would you do it at a five-star hotel?
Nearly half a century after the first Earth Day, the chessboard has changed dramatically. The players with the power, the war chests, and the influence are different now.
A Greenpeace spokesperson suggests that the only people concerned about the video in which kids are executed for insufficient eco enthusiasm are those with ulterior motives – “climate skeptics and think tanks funded by corporations.”
One day entire books will be written about the mainstream media’s pathetic coverage of the climate change debate.