Canadian journalist Donna Laframboise has been watching the climate world since 2009. What she sees isn't pretty.
I’ve been busy, immersed, distracted lately. I’ve been reading, reading, reading. Books and websites and scientific journals. News stories and blogs and Twitter feeds. My brain is bursting with facts and figures I’m struggling to make sense of.
It has been 14 years since I wrote my first and only book. Until now, I’ve felt no need to repeat the experience. But I may be on the cusp of changing my mind.
I believe in debate. I believe in questions. I believe anyone who wants anyone else to dramatically change their lives had better have a strong and persuasive argument.
My reading about global warming has left me bewildered, bemused – and alarmed. I’ve spent the past several weeks educating myself, and what I’ve learned isn’t pretty.
There’s a whole side of the global warming discussion that 90% of the mainstream media ignores. This is because editors and journalists are as susceptible to “group think” as anyone else. It’s also because reporters are often too rushed or too lazy to read anything more than the press release when a new study claims to have found yet another reason why global warming should scare us out of our wits.
I wish I didn’t feel the need to say anything at all about this topic. There are lots of other things I’d rather be thinking about in my spare time. But the current state of affairs is wrong.