Junkets abroad, handsomely-paid positions at home – no wonder government employees love the environment.
Climate crusaders urge us to Think of the children! But that can be used by anyone to advance any argument under the sun.
IPCC personnel are not the world’s “leading climate scientists.” They were chosen partly due to gender, age, and geographic considerations.
People who want to save the planet are fond of more laws and more red tape. They talk of silencing their opponents and sending people to prison.
A collection of NGO brats, self-important rich folks, and UN bureaucrats have taken it upon themselves to be the voice of future generations.
Two activist scientists, both committed to the climate change fight, have starkly different views of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. One says it’s the most “rigorous scientific process” in which he has been involved. The other says it isn’t good science, but “lowest-common-denominator-science.”
Any government body headed by eco-campaigner Tim Flannery cannot possibly be considered “independent”.
In early 2009 the Los Angeles Times said hot, dry Australia was a warning to us all – and that things would only get worse. The very next year, dry areas were flooded and snow fell during the summer.
Wild-eyed, apocalyptic predictions about the future are not news.