The world’s most important climate body dedicates its new document to a rude, intolerant, highly politicized climate crusader.
Ideas being promoted by ‘climate scientists’ look increasingly scary.
Is it any wonder that young climate scientists behave badly? Their elders set the example – by hurling insults at dissenters.
40 people belonged to the IPCC’s 2007 ‘core writing team.’ 11 of them have documented links to either the World Wildlife Fund or Greenpeace.
The scientists on this list either played some role in the 2007 Climate Bible or are helping to write the next one expected to be completed in 2013. In many cases, they’re doing dual duty.
All of them have a documented, public relationship with professional lobbyists.
How often does the media imply that IPCC Peace Prize winners are scientific Nobel laureates?
A naive grad student is the lead author of a controversial paper that purports to assess the credibility of scientists who hold a variety of views on climate change.
Since the 1970s, some scientists have embraced social & political activism. The public needs to be aware, therefore, that not every pronouncement made by a “scientist” is neutral or disinterested.