Why is a Supreme Court judge part of an unsavoury UN advisory panel?
A sitting UK Supreme Court judge took part in a Rio+20 event that said the UN (a political body) should be given more scope & authority.
Junkets abroad, handsomely-paid positions at home – no wonder government employees love the environment.
Greenpeace envisions a new system of global governance – in which unaccountable UN bureaucrats gain “real powers.”
The World Wildlife Fund is deploying anti-poaching surveillance drones in countries with spotty human rights records and non-existent oversight mechanisms.
According to the head of the United Nations, only one vision of the future is acceptable.
A group that’s supposed to be saving animals thinks the global economy must be transformed.
The current United Nations response to environmental concerns is doing more harm than good.
Nine papers are being distributed by an upcoming save-the-world conference. They’re explicitly intended to influence the behaviour of world leaders at the Rio summit in June. But the claim that they represent the latest scientific thinking is a gross distortion.