People who want to save the planet are fond of more laws and more red tape. They talk of silencing their opponents and sending people to prison.
40 people belonged to the IPCC’s 2007 ‘core writing team.’ 11 of them have documented links to either the World Wildlife Fund or Greenpeace.
In a single IPCC chapter we find an author affiliated the WWF, another with Greenpeace, and a third with the Environmental Defense Fund. Sure, this is a scientific document.
A small group of IPCC insiders filled as many as seven different roles each during the writing of the 2007 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report.
How often does the media imply that IPCC Peace Prize winners are scientific Nobel laureates?
According to some people, only a “climatologist” can be a credible scientific voice in the climate debate. Why do we spend so much time trying to disqualify people – rather than addressing their ideas?
Why does the media keep interviewing a meteorologist about droughts & floods instead of those with genuine expertise?