An IPCC document produced for its meeting in Yokohama uses emphatically activist language. What happened to the scientific body delivering a scientific report based on scientific research?
According to Ban Ki-moon, the latest IPCC report vaporized climate skepticism.
The WWF utilized UN press conference facilities yesterday. It’s doing so again today.
Multiple UN entities falsely describe the chairman of the IPCC as a Nobel prize winner.
Greenpeace envisions a new system of global governance – in which unaccountable UN bureaucrats gain “real powers.”
According to a new UN report, your meat consumption is killing the planet.
UN officials say we should listen to science. Don’t be fooled. It’s a rhetorical ploy, a cover for their own agenda.
Before there was Al Gore, there was George Mitchell. Politicians have been casting themselves as environmental crusaders, saving the planet, for two decades.
Nine papers are being distributed by an upcoming save-the-world conference. They’re explicitly intended to influence the behaviour of world leaders at the Rio summit in June. But the claim that they represent the latest scientific thinking is a gross distortion.
There is now a small army of experts, activists, and bureaucrats whose economic lives depend on there being a climate crisis. Without such a crisis their jobs, their travel to exotic places, and their moments in the media spotlight would all disappear.
A person who “played no role whatsoever” in an IPCC chapter nevertheless signed a statement that claimed otherwise.
22 years ago the UN said we had only 10 years to take global warming action. Otherwise, entire nations would drown due to rising sea levels by the year 2000.
13 times as many children die before their first birthday in Rwanda as in Canada or the UK. Most people live below the poverty line, and 3 out of 10 are illiterate. Yet a UN official says Rwanda has demonstrated “leadership” by banning plastic bags.