Canadian journalist Donna Laframboise has been watching the climate world since 2009. What she sees isn't pretty.
When I first began paying attention to the climate debate I was struck by the emotional, over-the-top language. When they discussed climate change, activists, journalists, and politicians didn’t sound measured and sensible. Rather, they appeared to have lost all sense of proportion.
Rather than speaking calmly and reassuringly (what I expect of real leaders in a real crisis), these people seemed intent on instilling fear (what demagogues trying to stampede public opinion have always done).
I started paying attention to this phenomenon three years ago. It remains a problem. Here’s a sampling of some of the language we’ve heard in recent weeks. All bolding has been added by me:
Well I’m one woman who isn’t as naive she used to be. I’ve learned that carbon dioxide – which is now routinely referred to as poison and pollution – is what every newborn babe exhales with every breath. It’s what bread dough emits as it rises. It’s what soft drink manufacturers use to carbonate the beverages that households consume by the litre every week of every year.
I’ve also discovered that the public has been advised at regular intervals that this is our last opportunity to save the planet – see this wonderful piece, An updated history of last chances to save the world. We’ll be hearing a great deal about the Rio Earth Summit soon since 2012 will mark its 20th anniversary. But back then, in 1992, the New Scientist magazine was running the headline Last chance to save the planet?
Again and again activists have played on our fears. Again and again they’ve insisted we take dramatic steps to respond to crises that don’t exist.
Well it’s all wearing a little thin, folks. Not to mention that its quite despicable, really. Giving little kids nightmares isn’t an honourable way to earn a living.
h/t Tom Nelson